Beskrivelse
Peer review is one of the most invisible forms of academic labor: a hidden infrastructure of evaluation, carried out behind double-blind screens. It shapes careers, disciplines, and knowledge itself – yet, as a genre, it remains curiously opaque. Peer review is, at its best, the cornerstone of quality assurance in research:a quiet machinery of trust and attention. But when it fails, its opacity becomes a problem, especially for early-career researchers who rely on these unseen systems of feedback and recognition. In this workshop, we will spend two hours exploring how peer review might feel, if it were less about judgment and more about attention and co-thinking. Rather than polishing arguments or evaluating merit, we will ask what
it means to read in ways that leave traces: to treat critique as a situated, collective practice. The workshop is part of IPA’s work to publish a book on collective research practices within arts and cultural studies in Denmark today. The goal is – by virtue of the publication’s process and content – to suggest a counter-image to parts of the individualizing tendencies within this research. The book is realized together with the independent publisher Aleatorik.
| Periode | 5 maj 2025 |
|---|---|
| Grad af anerkendelse | National |