Research

An Argument for Design Space Reflection

Publication: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings

Standard

An Argument for Design Space Reflection. / Dove, Graham; Halskov, Kim; Hansen, Nicolai Brodersen.

NordiCHI '16 : Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ed. / Wolmet Barendregt ; Mohammad Obaid . Association for Computing Machinery, 2016.

Publication: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings

Harvard

Dove, G, Halskov, K & Hansen, NB 2016, An Argument for Design Space Reflection. in W Barendregt & M Obaid (eds), NordiCHI '16 : Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/2971485.2971528

APA

Dove, G., Halskov, K., & Hansen, N. B. (2016). An Argument for Design Space Reflection. In W. Barendregt , & M. Obaid (Eds.), NordiCHI '16 : Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/2971485.2971528

CBE

Dove G, Halskov K, Hansen NB. 2016. An Argument for Design Space Reflection. Barendregt W, Obaid M, editors. In NordiCHI '16 : Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery. Available from: 10.1145/2971485.2971528

MLA

Dove, Graham, Kim Halskov, and Nicolai Brodersen Hansen "An Argument for Design Space Reflection". and Barendregt , Wolmet Obaid , Mohammad (ed.). NordiCHI '16 : Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery. 2016. Available: 10.1145/2971485.2971528

Vancouver

Dove G, Halskov K, Hansen NB. An Argument for Design Space Reflection. In Barendregt W, Obaid M, editors, NordiCHI '16 : Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery. 2016. Available from, DOI: 10.1145/2971485.2971528

Author

Dove, Graham; Halskov, Kim; Hansen, Nicolai Brodersen / An Argument for Design Space Reflection.

NordiCHI '16 : Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ed. / Wolmet Barendregt ; Mohammad Obaid . Association for Computing Machinery, 2016.

Publication: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings

Bibtex

@inbook{ba5a300eff744c53b82ca4b93db93483,
title = "An Argument for Design Space Reflection",
keywords = "Design space, reflective practice, design documentation",
author = "Graham Dove and Kim Halskov and Hansen, {Nicolai Brodersen}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1145/2971485.2971528",
isbn = "978-1-4503-4763-1",
editor = "{Barendregt }, {Wolmet } and {Obaid }, {Mohammad }",
booktitle = "NordiCHI '16",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - An Argument for Design Space Reflection

AU - Dove,Graham

AU - Halskov,Kim

AU - Hansen,Nicolai Brodersen

PY - 2016/10/27

Y1 - 2016/10/27

N2 - We argue that documenting, revisiting and reflecting on the design space of a project provides three important benefits. First it increases our awareness of the constraints introduced by particular design choices. Second, this qualifies our understanding of the way a design space has been filtered by design activities. Third we are prompted to challenge these constraints and reconsider disregarded opportunities. To support this argument, we revisit key activities from two projects in our interaction design lab’s portfolio, selected because of the detailed documentation available. We also introduce SnapShot, the web-based tool we are developing for this method of design space reflection. Based on these examples, we present a critical discussion and outline areas of future research.

AB - We argue that documenting, revisiting and reflecting on the design space of a project provides three important benefits. First it increases our awareness of the constraints introduced by particular design choices. Second, this qualifies our understanding of the way a design space has been filtered by design activities. Third we are prompted to challenge these constraints and reconsider disregarded opportunities. To support this argument, we revisit key activities from two projects in our interaction design lab’s portfolio, selected because of the detailed documentation available. We also introduce SnapShot, the web-based tool we are developing for this method of design space reflection. Based on these examples, we present a critical discussion and outline areas of future research.

KW - Design space

KW - reflective practice

KW - design documentation

U2 - 10.1145/2971485.2971528

DO - 10.1145/2971485.2971528

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 978-1-4503-4763-1

BT - NordiCHI '16

PB - Association for Computing Machinery

ER -