Study on assessing the environmental fiscal reform potential for the EU28

Publikation: RådgivningRapport

  • Dominic Hogg
    Dominic HoggStorbritannien
  • Timothy Elliott
    Timothy ElliottStorbritannien
  • Laurence Elliott
    Laurence ElliottStorbritannien
  • Sarah Ettlinger
    Sarah EttlingerStorbritannien
  • Tanzir Chowdhury
    Tanzir Chowdhury
  • Ayesha Bapasola
    Ayesha Bapasola
  • Luke Emery
    Luke Emery
  • Mikael Skou Andersen
  • Patrick ten Brink
    Patrick ten BrinkBelgien
  • Sirina Withana
    Sirina WithanaInstitute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP)Belgien
  • J. Schweitzer
    J. Schweitzer
  • Andreas Illes
    Andreas Illes
  • Kamila Paquel
    Kamila Paquel
  • Konar Mutafoglu
    Konar Mutafoglu
  • Jamie Woollard
    Jamie Woollard
  • Ignasi Ventosa
    Ignasi Ventosa
  • Sergio Sastre
    Sergio Sastre
  • Luis Campos
    Luis Campos
The 2016 European Semester will soon begin with the adoption of the Annual Growth Survey (AGS) (expected to be in November 2015). The AGS contains priorities which should be addressed in the National Reform Programmes (NRPs) which are due by the end of April 2016. Subsequently, the Commission will propose a series of Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) accompanied by an analysis in the form of Commission Staff Working Documents (SWDs) for each Member State. The CSRs will be discussed and subsequently adopted following endorsement by the European Council in June/July. It is intended that this study may feed into the development of the CSRs for 2016.
The previous (2015) AGS acknowledged that "employment and growth can be stimulated by shifting the tax burden away from labour towards other types of taxes which are less detrimental to growth, such as recurrent property, environment and consumption taxes”. The AGS set out three pillars that it foresaw as underpinning the EU’s economic and social policy for 2015:
 A coordinated response to boosting investment;
 A renewed commitment to structural reforms; and
 The pursuit of fiscal responsibility.
Environmental taxes (together with consumption and recurrent property taxes) are considered less detrimental to growth than other taxes such as on labour or corporate income and are increasingly promoted in the context of economic recovery and growth-friendly fiscal consolidation. The references to more growth friendly tax systems, and the expressed desire to promote more efficient use of both energy and other resources, point towards a role for environmental fiscal reform (EFR) as a means to set the European economy on a trajectory of growth with a strong shade of green.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
UdgivelsesstedBruxelles
Vol/bindENV D.2/ETU/2015/0005
Antal sider712
Rekvirerende organEuropean Commission
StatusUdgivet - 15 jan. 2016

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

Aktiviteter

ID: 96224641