Institut for Statskundskab

Fresh Starts for Poor Health Choices: Should We Provide Them and Who Should Pay?

Publikation: Forskning - peer reviewTidsskriftartikel

Should we grant a fresh start to those who come to regret their past lifestyle choices? A negative response to this question can be located in the luck egalitarian literature. As a responsibility-sensitive theory of justice, luck egalitarianism considers it just that people’s relative positions reflect their past choices, including those they regret. In a recent article, Vansteenkiste, Devooght and Schokkaert argue against the luck egalitarian view, maintaining instead that those who regret their past choices in health are disadvantaged in a relevant way and should receive compensation. Employing the ideal that people should be made equal as measured by equivalent resources they purport to show the fairness of such an arrangement through a hypothetical scenario. Relaxing the implicit assumptions of this scenario brings forth several unattractive consequences of the fresh start idea. The main problem is that in striving to ensure that people’s past choices do not affect their own opportunities, the authors must accept that these choices put heavy strains on the opportunities available to other people. Furthermore, the luck egalitarian position is more compelling than they admit.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPublic Health Ethics
Vol/bind9
Tidsskriftsnummer1
Sider (fra-til)55-64
Antal sider10
ISSN1754-9973
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

Download-statistik

Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 90501490