Are you better? A multi-centre study of patient-defined recovery from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

    A Llewellyn, Royal United Hospitals, Bath, UK, StorbritannienCS McCabe, Royal United Hospitals, Bath, UK, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK, StorbritannienY Hibberd, Royal United Hospitals, Bath, UK, StorbritannienP White, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK, StorbritannienL Davies, Royal United Hospitals, Bath, UK, StorbritannienJ Marinus, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands, HollandRGSM Perez, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., I Thomassen, Dutch National CRPS Patient Organization, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, F Brunner, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, C Sontheim, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, F Birklein, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany, T Schlereth, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany, DKD HELIOS Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany, A Goebel, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust and Pain Research Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, R Haigh, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK, R Connett, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK, C Maihöfner, Department of Neurology, General Hospital Fürth, Fürth, Germany,
  • Lone Knudsen
  • RN Harden, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, A Zyluk, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland, D Schulman, Markham-Stouffville Hospital, Markham, ON, Canada, H Small, PARC (Promoting Awareness of RSD and CRPS in Canada), St. Catharines, Canada, F Gobeil, CSSS Pierre Boucher, Longueuil, QC, Canada, P Moskovitz, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
Background: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) symptoms can
significantly differ between patients, fluctuate over time, disappear or
persist. This leads to problems in defining recovery and in evaluating the
efficacy of therapeutic interventions.
Objectives: To define recovery from the patients’ perspective and better
understand their priorities for treatment approaches.
Methods: Establishing an international consortium, we used a 2-Round
Delphi-based study in eight countries across Europe and North America.
Participants ≥18 years who met, or had met, Budapest clinical criteria
were included. Round 1 participants completed the statement: ‘I would/
do consider myself recovered from CRPS if/because. . .’ alongside
demographic and health questionnaires. Data were thematically
organised and represented as 62 statements, from which participants
identified and ranked their recovery priorities in Round 2.
Results: Round 1 (N = 347, 80% female, 91% non-recovered)
dominant ICF themes were: activities of daily living; bodily functions;
external factors; participation and personal factors. The top five priority
statements in Round 2 (N = 252) were: no longer having (1) CRPSrelated
pain, (2) generalised pain and discomfort, (3) restricted range of
movement, (4) need for medication, (5) stiffness in the affected limb.
With very few exceptions, priorities were consistent, irrespective of
patient demographics/geography. Symptoms affecting daily activities
were among those most frequently reported.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Pain
Vol/bind22
Sider (fra-til)551-564
ISSN1090-3801
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 120225527